Tim isolated Google as the only worthwhile ‘optimisation’ target, and introduced some common fallacies. His notable points were:

  • Google does not crawl meta data
  • Keyword density isn’t important. Mentioning a term once on a page should be adequate
  • Content is not rated by semantic relevancy
  • Buying links is officially frowned-upon, though realistically, links are very commonly ‘bought’ in one way or another- even from Google themselves
  • Markup structures are important, but not as important as most SEOs say
  • Google does analyse page structure to discount footers, advertising blocks, etc. (see ‘page segmentation analysis’).
  • SEO advice is predominantly [erm...] cobblers.

Both Tim and Dominic (speaking later) recommend SEO Dojo as a (rare) worthwhile source for SEO information.

Tim accepted a few questions, outlining how you might become relisted if Google have penalised you [with a 'reconsideration request']; how problematic penalisation can be [usually 'not very']; some potential hostile SEO tactics and how you might try to recover from them [perhaps employing a 'Reputation Management Consultant', though Tim's general feeling on those in this role is less than glowing...]

References: Tim Nash@tnash